The United States has been dropping bombs and using ammunition containing depleted uranium in Iraq and Afghanistan since the first Gulf War started in 1991. Depleted uranium is still highly radioactive, and according to world scientists, these countries have now been horribly radioactively contaminated, as have, potentially, areas within 1,000 square miles of those countries. Soldiers serving in these countries have now been contaminated, also. Gulf War Syndrome from the first Gulf War has left tens of thousands of soldiers sick...
So for those of you who think the collective reality of Planet Earth is not important to all inhabitants...to those who think what other people do is of no concern and it's all about the individual "creating its own reality," untouched by what the collective is doing...read on...
Here is a 2004 interview with a scientist specializing in radiation and public health discussing these issues:
Hello, this is Don Nordin. You’re listening to the Monday Brownbagger (Vancouver Cooperative Radio - 102.7 fm) of February 23, 2004 and I will have on the line in a moment a guest from Berkeley. Her name is Leuren Moret. She is an independent scientist and international expert on radiation and public health issues. She is on the organizing committee of the World Committee on Radiation Risk, an organization of independent radiation specialists, including members of the Radiation Committee in the EU parliament, the European Committee on Radiation Risk. She is an environmental commissioner for the City of Berkeley. Ms. Moret earned her BS in geology at U.C. Davis in 1968 and her MA in Near Eastern studies from U.C. Berkeley in 1978. She has completed all but her dissertation for a PhD in the geosciences at U.C. Davis. She has travelled and conducted scientific research in 42 countries. She wrote a scientific report on depleted uranium for the United Nations sub commission investigating the illegality of depleted uranium munitions. Marian Falk, a former Manhattan Project scientist and retired insider at the Livermore Lab, who is an expert on radioactive fallout and rainout, has trained her on radiation issues.
(Don) So let’s get into it. I’ll ask you to tell the folks what depleted uranium is.
(Leuren) Depleted uranium basically is the radioactive trash from the nuclear weapons and the nuclear power plant programs, and three isotopes of uranium occur in nature, so when it is mined those three isotopes are extracted from the ore. The DU is about 99.9% U-238, 0.72% U-235 that is the fissionable isotope used in nuclear bombs and reactor fuel, and there’s just a trace of U-234 left in a tenth of a percent of the remainder. So what they do is they make a gas out of it, and they extract half a percent of the U-235 and what is left, which is 99.95% of what they mine, is called depleted uranium because it is depleted in U-235. It does not mean that it is depleted in radioactivity; it’s actually very radioactive.
(Don) What kind of a half-life do these constituents of the depleted uranium have?
(Leuren) The half life of U-238, which is the majority of what we’re talking about, is 4.5 billion years and it’s actually a component of meteorites, planets, stars, space dust and it is distributed throughout the earth at about 2.4 parts per million, and because it is radioactive, it releases tiny amounts of heat over time and that is why we have a liquid or molten interior in the earth. It’s from the decay of U-238.
(Don) Do you have any idea of how much depleted uranium the U.S. has in its national inventory?
(Leuren) Yes, the U.S. has about a million tons of depleted uranium. Most of it is stored in canisters as uranium hexafluoride, and it’s just really an environmental problem. There is no place to dispose of it so in 1974, against the advice of the Department of Energy, the Department of Defence began testing and manufacturing weapons made out of DU and the first system was manufactured by Hughes Aircraft. It was called the Phalanx System developed by the Navy and within six months of the Navy testing it, they had sold it to 14 branches of the U.S. military and other countries. We have now sold DU weapons systems to 29 countries.
(Don) In what kind of weapons is this DU used?
(Leuren) Well, depleted uranium is made in every calibre [and used in projectiles] for handguns, tanks, cannons, all the way up to large bombs weighing more than 5,000 lbs [and also used in the body of] the Warthog airplane. So everything from handguns to bombs practically has...many have conventional weapons for ammunition but they also have them in depleted uranium. A lot of systems are interchangeable. You can put a DU warhead in a bomb or a conventional warhead in the same bomb.
(Don) Did I hear you say they’re using depleted uranium in the actual airplanes themselves?
(Leuren) Oh, yeah. The US Air Force and the US Army are the largest users of depleted uranium. For instance, [DU is] very, very frequently used in the A-10 Warthog, but other [military] planes, and weapons systems carried by many planes, have DU.
(Don) Now why would they use it in the construction of an airplane itself?
(Leuren) Oh, depleted uranium or uranium metal is nearly twice as dense as lead and so instead of using larger amounts of a dense material like lead, they can use smaller amounts of depleted uranium as ballast in planes, so they use it in commercial planes and in military planes as ballast along the wings and the tail to balance the plane. [It’s] very similar to the lead lugs they put on tires when we go and get our tires balanced.
(Don) Well, I guess, anyway, the DU being in the wings and tail wouldn’t be of any significant threat to the occupants of the plane itself.
(Leuren) It’s not to the occupants of the plane; it is to crash site investigators when a plane crashes. There was depleted uranium in whatever hit the Pentagon on 9-11 and I’m the only journalist in the world who even wrote an article about it. The German science journal Nature picked up my article and actually wrote its own [article] based on the interviews I did. It’s used in golf clubs. it’s used in many, many surprising things and because there is so much of it, which the Department of Energy has, they’re trying to find ways to dispose of it. And there are proposals now to put it inside building blocks to construct buildings with. So if this continues we’ll be living in radioactive buildings and then the terrible thing is that when the aluminium from planes or the metal from planes is recycled, the DU is not removed, so the metal that is re-manufactured will contain radioactive DU mixed in with it.
(Don) Now, of this one million tons of depleted uranium in the United States, how is that stored?
(Leuren) Oh, it’s stored at, for instance, Oakridge, Tennessee. There’s a big nuclear weapons lab facility there and it’s stored as uranium hexafluoride gas in huge drums, and they’re just stacked outside on top of each other. It’s also stored at Portsmouth, Ohio and other locations—Hanford in Washington State.
(Don) So the storage issue itself must be quite problematic.
(Leuren) It’s very problematic and the canisters that it’s stored in, the big drums, are subject to corrosion on the outside and the barrels that are stored closest to the ground and subjected to moisture and heat and bacterial action corrode faster.
(Don) Now, in the bombs that were dropped on Iraq and Afghanistan, what percentage of depleted uranium would be typically used in those bombs?
(Leuren) That’s a classified piece of information, but I would suspect that much of [the bombs’ weight] is the depleted uranium ballast, and because it’s so dense and heavy, as it falls there’s a lot of kinetic energy [produced] and when it hits the ground or when a uranium shell hits a target, that kinetic energy is converted into heat. So when the bomb hits the ground, you can actually identify depleted uranium bombs because the uranium is very hot. Probably some of it is liquid or molten and there is a shower of tiny pieces of depleted uranium that are on fire. It splutters all over the place and at least 70% is aerosolised into particles and fumes and dust of radioactive depleted uranium oxides that are smaller than bacteria or viruses. These [particles] are hundreds and thousands of times smaller than blood cells, so it’s inhaled by anyone in the contaminated areas, both enemy and our own soldiers. And [those particles] go directly into the bloodstream and are distributed like fairy dust throughout the body. And it’s insoluble so the body cannot excrete it and it just destroys a person’s body over time.
(Don) So it’s likely that practically all the individuals, let’s say in Baghdad including the U.S. Marines, are contaminated with depleted uranium now.
(Leuren) Anyone within 1,000 miles of Iraq; anyone within 1,000 miles of Afghanistan is potentially contaminated now. It’s not just the people [living] in the country. Anyone going to Iraq or Afghanistan now will become contaminated. There’s no way to escape it.
(Don) Now, for the average soldier over there, what types of reactions would this likely be causing in the body?
(Leuren) In the first Gulf War they used an estimated 340 or 350 tons of DU and the amount used is increasing every year. So there were terrible effects from that [which people know as] the Gulf War Syndrome. In Afghanistan a thousand tons were used, three times as much. The entire country, the water supplies, the infrastructure were bombed, and now in last March and April they used at least 2,200 tons, which is eight to ten times more than what they used in Gulf War One, and like Afghanistan, they bombed the whole country, the towns, the cities, the villages, the water supplies, the whole infrastructure of the country. So civilians and soldiers will be experiencing skin rashes, which is the heavy metal effect; they will have dental problems, respiratory problems. It’s causing heart damage and brain damage. The effects will be much more severe and much faster now than what we know of in Afghanistan or the first Gulf War in 1991. In Kuwait, which is downwind [of Iraq], and DU was used in Kuwait, doctors are reporting three times the number of congenital heart problems with newborn babies. Those are the birth defects. Gulf War soldiers who served in 1991 had normal babies before the Gulf War. [In a study of 251 Gulf War veterans by the Department of Veterans Affairs, it was determined that 67% of the babies born to soldiers after the Gulf War had severe birth defects]. They were born without brains, without eyes, [with] organs missing, without legs or arms, or they had terrible radiation related blood diseases for instance.
(Don) How many years is this effect likely to go on?
(Leuren) It will be forever. The half life of depleted uranium is 4 and a half billion years, but even worse, over time as the Uranium-238 decays, it transforms four times into much more radioactive daughter products or daughter isotopes and they are more radioactive than uranium-238 by millions and billions of times, so the level of radioactivity will increase over time, and that’s why we call depleted uranium the Trojan Horse of Nuclear War. Depleted uranium is a nuclear weapon and it is a weapon of mass destruction under the U.S. government definition of WMDs.
(Don) Now you have done some comparison, I believe, as to the radiation effects from the bomb dropped on Nagasaki in relation to the radiation in Iraq and Afghanistan. Would you like to talk about that?
(Leuren) Yes. In October 16 to 19, 2003 there was a very, very excellent and very important world conference on depleted uranium weapons held in Hamburg, Germany. Two hundred people from 20 countries and five continents attended [including] scientific, medical, legal experts, organizers, and activists and there were also Iraqi medical doctors and scientists there. And I’ve never been to a conference like that. It was very, very interesting, very informative and sometimes difficult to have all of the affected parties involved.
But some of the talks presented very important facts, and a Japanese physicist, professor Yagasaki from Okinawa, presented one of them. He had calculated the atomicity equivalent of the Nagasaki bomb to depleted uranium, and the atomicity means the number of radioactive atoms. So he calculated that 800 tons of depleted uranium is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. So [the total atomicity], roughly estimating the amount of depleted uranium weapons used in Afghanistan and Iraq and former Yugoslavia, is approximately equivalent to 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. In all of the testing by the nuclear states during the Cold War, the [atomicity] equivalent of only 40,000 [Nagasaki] bombs was [produced], so this is roughly ten times the amount of radiation that was released during nuclear
weapons testing. This is just an absolutely horrendous amount of radiation. The U.S. has staged a nuclear war in Iraq and in the Middle East and Central Asia, and the northern half of India all the way through Turkey and Iran and the Russian oil-rich states, the Caspian oil region, and half of Egypt, Israel and the Saudi Arabian peninsula. These areas are now all contaminated.
(Don) There are measurable signs of depleted uranium in those countries?
(Leuren) There was before. There was in the Saudi Arabian peninsula, Kuwait, Hungary, Greece—this was all reported after the 1991 bombing. Over time, [with] these very dry climates, the extreme dust storms and wind storms transport the radioactive material. The dust, as atmospheric dust, [is] scattered all over Europe. It’s transported across the Atlantic to North Carolina and the southern United States coastal areas, the Caribbean, and these dust storms carry sand all over Europe. I’ve lived in England in the 1960s and 70s, and sometimes Sahara dust was on our windshields in the morning in the streets. It’s known from mediaeval times.
(Don) So it seems to me that, especially now and in future years, not so future either, with the lowering of our quality of food and of our immune system, that even in the fringe areas and areas around the world where there’s not so much of this dust, that DU is going to have an effect on [the number of] cancer deaths.
(Leuren) Well I am a geoscientist, so I study the earth and earth processes. [I do] research at U.C. Davis—I haven’t finished my dissertation yet, but my research has been on atmospheric dust. I was studying the ice record, glaciers on the top of the Andes and Greenland and Antarctica and on top of the Himalayas, Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, and [the study of] these ice records on glaciers are like the study of tree rings. They have an annual record of the dust transported around the world and also atmospheric gases, and the radiation released each year is preserved in each layer of ice. So we know from volcanic eruptions, like Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, that the dust from volcanoes, the volcanic dust and ash, is globally mixed throughout the entire atmosphere in one year. So whatever they have been bombing with is, in one year, globally mixed throughout the entire atmosphere. And right now the world is in a global cancer epidemic and other radiation related diseases, which is a result of the Cold War weapons testing. We’ve added ten times as much radiation to the Middle East and Central Asia. Much of it will remain in the area recycling through the waters, the dust, the food, and the air. It’s inescapable. But a lot of it will also be transported throughout the world. And remember that cancer starts with a single atom of uranium, a single alpha particle or gamma ray released from one atom under the right conditions. So it doesn’t just affect humans, it affects all life. Everything will mutate, will be affected, if it’s exposed under the right conditions.
(Don) Well, the question that comes to mind is: Do the people who are waging war against the world in the United States and those that are releasing depleted uranium to be used in these weapons, realize the effects of depleted uranium on the environment and on people?
(Leuren) Of course. The United States has since spent 300 billion dollars-that’s a conservative estimate up to 1995-on nuclear weapons
development. I worked at two nuclear weapons laboratories: The Lawrence Berkeley Lab, and the Lawrence Livermore Lab. This entire time they have conducted detailed and very extensive studies on the biological effects of radiation. They absolutely know everything about the impact on the environment and on human health of what they are doing, and when I worked at Livermore from 1989 to ‘91, [before] I finally walked out one day and became a whistleblower, I watched teams of radiation experts leaving that lab monthly, weekly, yearly travelling to radioactive contaminated sites all over the world, taking collections of plant materials and living materials like
the fish out of the rivers or the lagoons. [They also studied] the human guinea pigs, people at Chernobyl, at the Pacific Islands where nuclear weapons were tested and even Americans [in the] the nuclear weapons program and the nuclear power plant program. They have special laboratories at Los Alamos Nuclear Weapons Lab and Livermore. They have special units with instruments to measure the radiation and samples, freezers to keep the samples in, and in the labs that I’ve worked in, there are charts with defective sperm on the walls. I remember walking by them every day. They know everything.
(Don) So if they know the effects of depleted uranium on people, does that not then make them the highest type of war criminals?
(Leuren) These are the highest types of war criminals. These people have developed weapons of mass destruction knowing full well what the health and environmental effects are, and they have spent tremendous amounts of money and effort to hide this from not just the American people, but from the global community. They have constructed a huge and a very connected apparatus of scientists, scientific journals, medical professionals, academic institutions, secret radiation labs, and nuclear weapons laboratories. We have over 550 national laboratories in the United States-I think the number has been reduced maybe to 250, but there were over 3,500 facilities in the United States, which functioned as part of the nuclear weapons complex. There’s no way that they don’t know everything and the international nuclear-I call them the nuclear Mafia-has mostly been controlled by the United States. It’s all to hide the health and environmental effects.
(Don) They seem not to be only the highest types of criminals, but they seem to be insane. I mean only an insane...
(Leuren) It’s a culture of insanity! You’re absolutely right. I worked at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab. I saw people go to work every day. Their friends were dying of cancer. Some of them had cancer. You know that a nuclear weapons lab paycheck is about 30 to 40% more than scientists would make in a private sector academia. So people get addicted to that money and their wives die of brain cancer. Their children die of leukaemia and they still go to work every day.
(Don) Yeah, George W.’s son and progeny are going to be affected for all time.
(Leuren) George Bush Jr., our president now, he and all of his siblings have learning disabilities as a result of being exposed to nuclear weapons testing fallout during the Cold War. And his toddler sister died of leukaemia when she was just a couple of years old. His whole family has been affected by nuclear weapons testing. This is the insanity of it. They do it anyway.
(Don) Yeah, it doesn’t bode very well to be ruled by people that are brain cell deficient, that’s for sure.
(Leuren) Well, it’s had a tremendous effect on the I.Q. and the learning ability of all American children. The SAT scores, the average SAT scores for the entire population of 18 year-olds, teenagers in their last year of high school when they are given the SAT tests, declined from 475 which was the average score for 20 years before bomb testing started and it started in about 1946. By 1963 the SAT scores for children born that year, [those children] exposed in utero to the radiation and receiving brain damage, [declined nationwide] to 425. As soon as the test ban treaty was signed between the U.S. and Russia in 1963, SAT scores started going up again. But what the United States did was sacrifice an entire generation of children to test nuclear weapons. The same thing is happening now because of nuclear power plants and one out of twelve children have learning disabilities in the U.S. What cost is that to our society?
(Don) Hasn’t Baghdad, and maybe even the whole country of Iraq, been made virtually an area that is not suitable for living in now?
(Leuren) Oh, and the regions within a thousand miles. The Middle East and Central Asia are radioactive. People shouldn’t be living there; nothing should be living there. And I began to read—I couldn’t believe it—when I started researching it, I just couldn’t believe it. I couldn’t believe what had happened. I couldn’t believe they were using depleted uranium in the amounts they were using. And when that Japanese professor calculated the atomicity equivalent of Nagasaki bombs, I started making maps of the areas contaminated and when I saw the map with circles drawn around Afghanistan and Iraq with a one thousand mile radius, I knew there was a deeper purpose.
But I still couldn’t understand why they’d used it. No other country has used it. The U.S. broke a 46-year taboo in 1991 and used it. No other countries have used it since then. There has to be a reason, and I began to read The Grand Chessboard by Brzezinski. Anyway he, Zbigniew Brzezinski—it’s called The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperative—wrote it in 1998 but it’s a blueprint, absolutely, for U.S. foreign policy being carried out in Central Asia and the Middle East. And they have basically bombed the major oil rich regions in the Eurasian area. This is not going to stop. It’s going to continue.
Call-In Portion of Interview
(Caller #1) Listening to your guest. Great topic. Good guest! I’ve just got a few things to say. I was just thinking about this. I think you are absolutely right when you say that the people who are doing these kind of things to humanity, there is no other reason: they must either just be insane or incredibly sinister and perhaps another reason exists that maybe we don’t really think about. Has anyone ever thought that maybe these leaders, these mad bombers and serial killers such as George W. Bush and his father-what about the theory that these people are really reptilians from another dimension or planet perhaps who have invaded our human areas and who are carrying out their own agenda?
(Don) Well I don’t know if I’d like to degrade the reptilian race by saying they’re reptilians. (Laugh)
(Caller #1) OK. I don’t know what other reason exists other than I didn’t realize people are [so] completely sinister and I throw in a guy like George W. Bush, of course. But I’ll just hang up now and listen to your comments and perhaps your guest’s comments. Thank you.
(Caller #2) Well, I’d just like to discuss for example Helen Caldicott, who has been active in struggling against nuclear weapons proliferation, and there are groups out there struggling against radiation and all different types of organizations fighting to reduce the amount of damage done through militarism and international aggression and so on. But there seems to be a real lack of democratic decision-making processes within these organizations.
(Don) That’s for sure.
(Caller #2) Yeah. There is very little in the way of public involvement and there is virtually no democratic decision-making that is taking place just based on the empirical information relevant to the decisions to be made, rather than the persuasive, coercive influence of leadership elements and PR firms, advertising agencies, media organizations, and different groups within these organizations.
I wonder if maybe she could speak to that, if there is any organization she’s aware of that are more democratic?
(Caller #3) I just had a question for Leuren. I was wondering which countries in Europe would be safe from contamination? Where would it be safe to visit?
(Don) I think she’s said that basically the whole world is contaminated but it’s just to a lesser degree. I would imagine that there’s a gradual [reduction] of radioactivity away from the central bombing areas, but we’ll go back to Leuren.
(Leuren) In terms of less contaminated areas, I would think Europe would be OK. Turkey is in the region of potential contamination and, if you are going for short visits, you have a better chance of not becoming contaminated. Of course there is no safe level of radiation exposure, but the people living in these regions, chronically exposed 24 hours a day to air borne [and] water borne [radiation], and [to] food contaminated with radiation, will be the most affected. It’s just everywhere. It’s really, I think, the greatest tragedy that humanity has faced. So I feel terrible about people who went to Iraq as human shields, to media who were there-they’re all contaminated. And when I was in Japan last summer I met the human shield people from Japan-they’re sick with depleted uranium exposure and over time it just continues to act in the body. So people really need to think about where they are going and be aware of the potential risk. Now the other question the gentleman had about this need for openness and democracy in the decision-making process [concerning] the nuclear weapons program, nuclear power plants, and now the DU, because it’s all the same-it’s alpha, beta, or gamma exposure internally whether it’s coming out of nuclear weapons, nuclear power plants, or depleted uranium or the radioactive weapons. The problem is that the secrecy has allowed these programs to be developed when they do tremendous harm to human health and all species, as well as the impact on the environment. And right now the United States is gearing up for a nuclear war. We now have nuclear weapons spending at the highest level ever-even [than] during the Cold War. It’s higher now than during the Cold War and the United States has no enemies. This is causing other countries to also increase nuclear weapons development and what I was shocked to discover in my research is that Japan and Germany are now tied in second place. They have passed Russia in nuclear weapons development. And the deeper purpose for all of this is to play nuclear blackmail and to frighten other countries into developing their nuclear weapons and thinking they need them. For
instance, India is afraid of Pakistan. Pakistan is afraid of India. Japan is afraid of North Korea. North Korea is afraid of South Korea. So everyone is developing nuclear weapons and what’s really happening is the US is manipulating these countries rimming China to develop nuclear weapons programs and we are enticing them to be our nuclear partners with China as a common and the real enemy.
(Don) I have so many more questions to ask you. One of the ones I wanted to ask is, what about the groundwater? Is that going to be contaminated for all time and how far away [from the areas of conflict] would it be contaminated?
(Leuren) The groundwater is contaminated of course. Over time, as the leftover bullets and ammunition that did not burn degrade and weather with the heat, and [with] the cold and seasonal changes-rain, snow, and the wind-[depleted uranium contamination] migrates into the groundwater. So there’s just a constant new supply of depleted uranium oxides and metal which will be released into the air and migrate through the ground into the groundwater. A study that the United Nations Environmental Program released last March 2003 reported that 25% of the bare metal, uranium bullets and weapons in the soil in Yugoslavia, had dissolved since 1998. So if 25% of the munitions buried in the ground dissolved in four or five years in a wet climate, it will be slower in desert areas, but it’s going to continue contaminating groundwater, soil, food and air.
(Don) And I think-you have mentioned that these particles go down into very fine sizes, so [I would imagine] there’s no way they can be filtered out of the water.
(Leuren) There’s no way to filter it out. It goes through all gas masks. It goes through all filters. These particles are a tenth of a micron or smaller. A red blood cell is seven microns and a white blood cell is about ten microns, so they are much, much smaller than even blood cells.
(Don) Before we wrap it up, I would like you to give us contacts on the website where people can find more information.
(Leuren) People can go to an excellent website:
www.mindfully.org and just do a Google search on my name, Moret.
They can also go to: www.traprockpeace.org That’s the Traprock Peace Centre in Connecticut. They have an excellent website. Lots of people get a lot of good information from it and they have a lot of information on depleted uranium. Those are probably the two best websites that I know of. There’s a letter to Congressman McDermott that I wrote. They could do a Google search on “letter to McDermott”. He’s a Congressman from Seattle, Washington who has introduced a bill in Congress, and I wrote him a letter with a lot of details. The attachments and the references are also on the website with a letter. That’s on the mindfully.org website, and then [there’s] my testimony for the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan of December 13, 2003, which is also on the mindfully.org website. That testimony] has fourteen questions that the prosecutor sent me to answer, and there are questions like: What does the U.S. government know about DU? (My answer was twelve pages long). What is the connection between depleted uranium and fourth generation nuclear weapons? And then, what are the environmental and human effects?
(Don) What I think has to happen is [that] some organizations in Vancouver have to get together and bring you into Vancouver for a large meeting.
(Don asks remaining callers to give comments only)
(Caller #4) Well I was wondering about the possibility of certain plants being used to decontaminate the human body and [the] possible development of bacteria that might be used for that purpose also?
(Don) I was asking for comments. We don’t have time for questions now.
(Caller #4) Well my comment is that it is one big inhumane, parasitic, military-industrial, ecocidal and social atrocity.
(Don) Thank you.
Last comment of Leuren Moret:
(Leuren) I would like to read a quote from Henry Kissinger. “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy”. This is what the elite believe about our military. I am now working with an international group of scientists and radiation experts. We are forming a World Committee on Radiation Risks comprised of honest researchers to help citizens, elected officials, affected populations and individuals to learn the truth about radiation, and to work toward an international moratorium on depleted uranium and other radioactive weapons. So watch for us. The European Committee on Radiation Risk, within the European Parliament, has just published an excellent report on low-level radiation and you can get it at: www.euradcom.org And now the citizens of the world, the scientists of the world, the radiation experts of the world—we have to all work together and it’s not hopeless. But people need good information.
So for those of you who think the collective reality of Planet Earth is not important to all inhabitants...to those who think what other people do is of no concern and it's all about the individual "creating its own reality," untouched by what the collective is doing...read on...
Here is a 2004 interview with a scientist specializing in radiation and public health discussing these issues:
Hello, this is Don Nordin. You’re listening to the Monday Brownbagger (Vancouver Cooperative Radio - 102.7 fm) of February 23, 2004 and I will have on the line in a moment a guest from Berkeley. Her name is Leuren Moret. She is an independent scientist and international expert on radiation and public health issues. She is on the organizing committee of the World Committee on Radiation Risk, an organization of independent radiation specialists, including members of the Radiation Committee in the EU parliament, the European Committee on Radiation Risk. She is an environmental commissioner for the City of Berkeley. Ms. Moret earned her BS in geology at U.C. Davis in 1968 and her MA in Near Eastern studies from U.C. Berkeley in 1978. She has completed all but her dissertation for a PhD in the geosciences at U.C. Davis. She has travelled and conducted scientific research in 42 countries. She wrote a scientific report on depleted uranium for the United Nations sub commission investigating the illegality of depleted uranium munitions. Marian Falk, a former Manhattan Project scientist and retired insider at the Livermore Lab, who is an expert on radioactive fallout and rainout, has trained her on radiation issues.
(Don) So let’s get into it. I’ll ask you to tell the folks what depleted uranium is.
(Leuren) Depleted uranium basically is the radioactive trash from the nuclear weapons and the nuclear power plant programs, and three isotopes of uranium occur in nature, so when it is mined those three isotopes are extracted from the ore. The DU is about 99.9% U-238, 0.72% U-235 that is the fissionable isotope used in nuclear bombs and reactor fuel, and there’s just a trace of U-234 left in a tenth of a percent of the remainder. So what they do is they make a gas out of it, and they extract half a percent of the U-235 and what is left, which is 99.95% of what they mine, is called depleted uranium because it is depleted in U-235. It does not mean that it is depleted in radioactivity; it’s actually very radioactive.
(Don) What kind of a half-life do these constituents of the depleted uranium have?
(Leuren) The half life of U-238, which is the majority of what we’re talking about, is 4.5 billion years and it’s actually a component of meteorites, planets, stars, space dust and it is distributed throughout the earth at about 2.4 parts per million, and because it is radioactive, it releases tiny amounts of heat over time and that is why we have a liquid or molten interior in the earth. It’s from the decay of U-238.
(Don) Do you have any idea of how much depleted uranium the U.S. has in its national inventory?
(Leuren) Yes, the U.S. has about a million tons of depleted uranium. Most of it is stored in canisters as uranium hexafluoride, and it’s just really an environmental problem. There is no place to dispose of it so in 1974, against the advice of the Department of Energy, the Department of Defence began testing and manufacturing weapons made out of DU and the first system was manufactured by Hughes Aircraft. It was called the Phalanx System developed by the Navy and within six months of the Navy testing it, they had sold it to 14 branches of the U.S. military and other countries. We have now sold DU weapons systems to 29 countries.
(Don) In what kind of weapons is this DU used?
(Leuren) Well, depleted uranium is made in every calibre [and used in projectiles] for handguns, tanks, cannons, all the way up to large bombs weighing more than 5,000 lbs [and also used in the body of] the Warthog airplane. So everything from handguns to bombs practically has...many have conventional weapons for ammunition but they also have them in depleted uranium. A lot of systems are interchangeable. You can put a DU warhead in a bomb or a conventional warhead in the same bomb.
(Don) Did I hear you say they’re using depleted uranium in the actual airplanes themselves?
(Leuren) Oh, yeah. The US Air Force and the US Army are the largest users of depleted uranium. For instance, [DU is] very, very frequently used in the A-10 Warthog, but other [military] planes, and weapons systems carried by many planes, have DU.
(Don) Now why would they use it in the construction of an airplane itself?
(Leuren) Oh, depleted uranium or uranium metal is nearly twice as dense as lead and so instead of using larger amounts of a dense material like lead, they can use smaller amounts of depleted uranium as ballast in planes, so they use it in commercial planes and in military planes as ballast along the wings and the tail to balance the plane. [It’s] very similar to the lead lugs they put on tires when we go and get our tires balanced.
(Don) Well, I guess, anyway, the DU being in the wings and tail wouldn’t be of any significant threat to the occupants of the plane itself.
(Leuren) It’s not to the occupants of the plane; it is to crash site investigators when a plane crashes. There was depleted uranium in whatever hit the Pentagon on 9-11 and I’m the only journalist in the world who even wrote an article about it. The German science journal Nature picked up my article and actually wrote its own [article] based on the interviews I did. It’s used in golf clubs. it’s used in many, many surprising things and because there is so much of it, which the Department of Energy has, they’re trying to find ways to dispose of it. And there are proposals now to put it inside building blocks to construct buildings with. So if this continues we’ll be living in radioactive buildings and then the terrible thing is that when the aluminium from planes or the metal from planes is recycled, the DU is not removed, so the metal that is re-manufactured will contain radioactive DU mixed in with it.
(Don) Now, of this one million tons of depleted uranium in the United States, how is that stored?
(Leuren) Oh, it’s stored at, for instance, Oakridge, Tennessee. There’s a big nuclear weapons lab facility there and it’s stored as uranium hexafluoride gas in huge drums, and they’re just stacked outside on top of each other. It’s also stored at Portsmouth, Ohio and other locations—Hanford in Washington State.
(Don) So the storage issue itself must be quite problematic.
(Leuren) It’s very problematic and the canisters that it’s stored in, the big drums, are subject to corrosion on the outside and the barrels that are stored closest to the ground and subjected to moisture and heat and bacterial action corrode faster.
(Don) Now, in the bombs that were dropped on Iraq and Afghanistan, what percentage of depleted uranium would be typically used in those bombs?
(Leuren) That’s a classified piece of information, but I would suspect that much of [the bombs’ weight] is the depleted uranium ballast, and because it’s so dense and heavy, as it falls there’s a lot of kinetic energy [produced] and when it hits the ground or when a uranium shell hits a target, that kinetic energy is converted into heat. So when the bomb hits the ground, you can actually identify depleted uranium bombs because the uranium is very hot. Probably some of it is liquid or molten and there is a shower of tiny pieces of depleted uranium that are on fire. It splutters all over the place and at least 70% is aerosolised into particles and fumes and dust of radioactive depleted uranium oxides that are smaller than bacteria or viruses. These [particles] are hundreds and thousands of times smaller than blood cells, so it’s inhaled by anyone in the contaminated areas, both enemy and our own soldiers. And [those particles] go directly into the bloodstream and are distributed like fairy dust throughout the body. And it’s insoluble so the body cannot excrete it and it just destroys a person’s body over time.
(Don) So it’s likely that practically all the individuals, let’s say in Baghdad including the U.S. Marines, are contaminated with depleted uranium now.
(Leuren) Anyone within 1,000 miles of Iraq; anyone within 1,000 miles of Afghanistan is potentially contaminated now. It’s not just the people [living] in the country. Anyone going to Iraq or Afghanistan now will become contaminated. There’s no way to escape it.
(Don) Now, for the average soldier over there, what types of reactions would this likely be causing in the body?
(Leuren) In the first Gulf War they used an estimated 340 or 350 tons of DU and the amount used is increasing every year. So there were terrible effects from that [which people know as] the Gulf War Syndrome. In Afghanistan a thousand tons were used, three times as much. The entire country, the water supplies, the infrastructure were bombed, and now in last March and April they used at least 2,200 tons, which is eight to ten times more than what they used in Gulf War One, and like Afghanistan, they bombed the whole country, the towns, the cities, the villages, the water supplies, the whole infrastructure of the country. So civilians and soldiers will be experiencing skin rashes, which is the heavy metal effect; they will have dental problems, respiratory problems. It’s causing heart damage and brain damage. The effects will be much more severe and much faster now than what we know of in Afghanistan or the first Gulf War in 1991. In Kuwait, which is downwind [of Iraq], and DU was used in Kuwait, doctors are reporting three times the number of congenital heart problems with newborn babies. Those are the birth defects. Gulf War soldiers who served in 1991 had normal babies before the Gulf War. [In a study of 251 Gulf War veterans by the Department of Veterans Affairs, it was determined that 67% of the babies born to soldiers after the Gulf War had severe birth defects]. They were born without brains, without eyes, [with] organs missing, without legs or arms, or they had terrible radiation related blood diseases for instance.
(Don) How many years is this effect likely to go on?
(Leuren) It will be forever. The half life of depleted uranium is 4 and a half billion years, but even worse, over time as the Uranium-238 decays, it transforms four times into much more radioactive daughter products or daughter isotopes and they are more radioactive than uranium-238 by millions and billions of times, so the level of radioactivity will increase over time, and that’s why we call depleted uranium the Trojan Horse of Nuclear War. Depleted uranium is a nuclear weapon and it is a weapon of mass destruction under the U.S. government definition of WMDs.
(Don) Now you have done some comparison, I believe, as to the radiation effects from the bomb dropped on Nagasaki in relation to the radiation in Iraq and Afghanistan. Would you like to talk about that?
(Leuren) Yes. In October 16 to 19, 2003 there was a very, very excellent and very important world conference on depleted uranium weapons held in Hamburg, Germany. Two hundred people from 20 countries and five continents attended [including] scientific, medical, legal experts, organizers, and activists and there were also Iraqi medical doctors and scientists there. And I’ve never been to a conference like that. It was very, very interesting, very informative and sometimes difficult to have all of the affected parties involved.
But some of the talks presented very important facts, and a Japanese physicist, professor Yagasaki from Okinawa, presented one of them. He had calculated the atomicity equivalent of the Nagasaki bomb to depleted uranium, and the atomicity means the number of radioactive atoms. So he calculated that 800 tons of depleted uranium is the atomicity equivalent of 83,000 Nagasaki bombs. So [the total atomicity], roughly estimating the amount of depleted uranium weapons used in Afghanistan and Iraq and former Yugoslavia, is approximately equivalent to 400,000 Nagasaki bombs. In all of the testing by the nuclear states during the Cold War, the [atomicity] equivalent of only 40,000 [Nagasaki] bombs was [produced], so this is roughly ten times the amount of radiation that was released during nuclear
weapons testing. This is just an absolutely horrendous amount of radiation. The U.S. has staged a nuclear war in Iraq and in the Middle East and Central Asia, and the northern half of India all the way through Turkey and Iran and the Russian oil-rich states, the Caspian oil region, and half of Egypt, Israel and the Saudi Arabian peninsula. These areas are now all contaminated.
(Don) There are measurable signs of depleted uranium in those countries?
(Leuren) There was before. There was in the Saudi Arabian peninsula, Kuwait, Hungary, Greece—this was all reported after the 1991 bombing. Over time, [with] these very dry climates, the extreme dust storms and wind storms transport the radioactive material. The dust, as atmospheric dust, [is] scattered all over Europe. It’s transported across the Atlantic to North Carolina and the southern United States coastal areas, the Caribbean, and these dust storms carry sand all over Europe. I’ve lived in England in the 1960s and 70s, and sometimes Sahara dust was on our windshields in the morning in the streets. It’s known from mediaeval times.
(Don) So it seems to me that, especially now and in future years, not so future either, with the lowering of our quality of food and of our immune system, that even in the fringe areas and areas around the world where there’s not so much of this dust, that DU is going to have an effect on [the number of] cancer deaths.
(Leuren) Well I am a geoscientist, so I study the earth and earth processes. [I do] research at U.C. Davis—I haven’t finished my dissertation yet, but my research has been on atmospheric dust. I was studying the ice record, glaciers on the top of the Andes and Greenland and Antarctica and on top of the Himalayas, Mount Kilimanjaro in Africa, and [the study of] these ice records on glaciers are like the study of tree rings. They have an annual record of the dust transported around the world and also atmospheric gases, and the radiation released each year is preserved in each layer of ice. So we know from volcanic eruptions, like Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, that the dust from volcanoes, the volcanic dust and ash, is globally mixed throughout the entire atmosphere in one year. So whatever they have been bombing with is, in one year, globally mixed throughout the entire atmosphere. And right now the world is in a global cancer epidemic and other radiation related diseases, which is a result of the Cold War weapons testing. We’ve added ten times as much radiation to the Middle East and Central Asia. Much of it will remain in the area recycling through the waters, the dust, the food, and the air. It’s inescapable. But a lot of it will also be transported throughout the world. And remember that cancer starts with a single atom of uranium, a single alpha particle or gamma ray released from one atom under the right conditions. So it doesn’t just affect humans, it affects all life. Everything will mutate, will be affected, if it’s exposed under the right conditions.
(Don) Well, the question that comes to mind is: Do the people who are waging war against the world in the United States and those that are releasing depleted uranium to be used in these weapons, realize the effects of depleted uranium on the environment and on people?
(Leuren) Of course. The United States has since spent 300 billion dollars-that’s a conservative estimate up to 1995-on nuclear weapons
development. I worked at two nuclear weapons laboratories: The Lawrence Berkeley Lab, and the Lawrence Livermore Lab. This entire time they have conducted detailed and very extensive studies on the biological effects of radiation. They absolutely know everything about the impact on the environment and on human health of what they are doing, and when I worked at Livermore from 1989 to ‘91, [before] I finally walked out one day and became a whistleblower, I watched teams of radiation experts leaving that lab monthly, weekly, yearly travelling to radioactive contaminated sites all over the world, taking collections of plant materials and living materials like
the fish out of the rivers or the lagoons. [They also studied] the human guinea pigs, people at Chernobyl, at the Pacific Islands where nuclear weapons were tested and even Americans [in the] the nuclear weapons program and the nuclear power plant program. They have special laboratories at Los Alamos Nuclear Weapons Lab and Livermore. They have special units with instruments to measure the radiation and samples, freezers to keep the samples in, and in the labs that I’ve worked in, there are charts with defective sperm on the walls. I remember walking by them every day. They know everything.
(Don) So if they know the effects of depleted uranium on people, does that not then make them the highest type of war criminals?
(Leuren) These are the highest types of war criminals. These people have developed weapons of mass destruction knowing full well what the health and environmental effects are, and they have spent tremendous amounts of money and effort to hide this from not just the American people, but from the global community. They have constructed a huge and a very connected apparatus of scientists, scientific journals, medical professionals, academic institutions, secret radiation labs, and nuclear weapons laboratories. We have over 550 national laboratories in the United States-I think the number has been reduced maybe to 250, but there were over 3,500 facilities in the United States, which functioned as part of the nuclear weapons complex. There’s no way that they don’t know everything and the international nuclear-I call them the nuclear Mafia-has mostly been controlled by the United States. It’s all to hide the health and environmental effects.
(Don) They seem not to be only the highest types of criminals, but they seem to be insane. I mean only an insane...
(Leuren) It’s a culture of insanity! You’re absolutely right. I worked at the Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab. I saw people go to work every day. Their friends were dying of cancer. Some of them had cancer. You know that a nuclear weapons lab paycheck is about 30 to 40% more than scientists would make in a private sector academia. So people get addicted to that money and their wives die of brain cancer. Their children die of leukaemia and they still go to work every day.
(Don) Yeah, George W.’s son and progeny are going to be affected for all time.
(Leuren) George Bush Jr., our president now, he and all of his siblings have learning disabilities as a result of being exposed to nuclear weapons testing fallout during the Cold War. And his toddler sister died of leukaemia when she was just a couple of years old. His whole family has been affected by nuclear weapons testing. This is the insanity of it. They do it anyway.
(Don) Yeah, it doesn’t bode very well to be ruled by people that are brain cell deficient, that’s for sure.
(Leuren) Well, it’s had a tremendous effect on the I.Q. and the learning ability of all American children. The SAT scores, the average SAT scores for the entire population of 18 year-olds, teenagers in their last year of high school when they are given the SAT tests, declined from 475 which was the average score for 20 years before bomb testing started and it started in about 1946. By 1963 the SAT scores for children born that year, [those children] exposed in utero to the radiation and receiving brain damage, [declined nationwide] to 425. As soon as the test ban treaty was signed between the U.S. and Russia in 1963, SAT scores started going up again. But what the United States did was sacrifice an entire generation of children to test nuclear weapons. The same thing is happening now because of nuclear power plants and one out of twelve children have learning disabilities in the U.S. What cost is that to our society?
(Don) Hasn’t Baghdad, and maybe even the whole country of Iraq, been made virtually an area that is not suitable for living in now?
(Leuren) Oh, and the regions within a thousand miles. The Middle East and Central Asia are radioactive. People shouldn’t be living there; nothing should be living there. And I began to read—I couldn’t believe it—when I started researching it, I just couldn’t believe it. I couldn’t believe what had happened. I couldn’t believe they were using depleted uranium in the amounts they were using. And when that Japanese professor calculated the atomicity equivalent of Nagasaki bombs, I started making maps of the areas contaminated and when I saw the map with circles drawn around Afghanistan and Iraq with a one thousand mile radius, I knew there was a deeper purpose.
But I still couldn’t understand why they’d used it. No other country has used it. The U.S. broke a 46-year taboo in 1991 and used it. No other countries have used it since then. There has to be a reason, and I began to read The Grand Chessboard by Brzezinski. Anyway he, Zbigniew Brzezinski—it’s called The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geo-strategic Imperative—wrote it in 1998 but it’s a blueprint, absolutely, for U.S. foreign policy being carried out in Central Asia and the Middle East. And they have basically bombed the major oil rich regions in the Eurasian area. This is not going to stop. It’s going to continue.
Call-In Portion of Interview
(Caller #1) Listening to your guest. Great topic. Good guest! I’ve just got a few things to say. I was just thinking about this. I think you are absolutely right when you say that the people who are doing these kind of things to humanity, there is no other reason: they must either just be insane or incredibly sinister and perhaps another reason exists that maybe we don’t really think about. Has anyone ever thought that maybe these leaders, these mad bombers and serial killers such as George W. Bush and his father-what about the theory that these people are really reptilians from another dimension or planet perhaps who have invaded our human areas and who are carrying out their own agenda?
(Don) Well I don’t know if I’d like to degrade the reptilian race by saying they’re reptilians. (Laugh)
(Caller #1) OK. I don’t know what other reason exists other than I didn’t realize people are [so] completely sinister and I throw in a guy like George W. Bush, of course. But I’ll just hang up now and listen to your comments and perhaps your guest’s comments. Thank you.
(Caller #2) Well, I’d just like to discuss for example Helen Caldicott, who has been active in struggling against nuclear weapons proliferation, and there are groups out there struggling against radiation and all different types of organizations fighting to reduce the amount of damage done through militarism and international aggression and so on. But there seems to be a real lack of democratic decision-making processes within these organizations.
(Don) That’s for sure.
(Caller #2) Yeah. There is very little in the way of public involvement and there is virtually no democratic decision-making that is taking place just based on the empirical information relevant to the decisions to be made, rather than the persuasive, coercive influence of leadership elements and PR firms, advertising agencies, media organizations, and different groups within these organizations.
I wonder if maybe she could speak to that, if there is any organization she’s aware of that are more democratic?
(Caller #3) I just had a question for Leuren. I was wondering which countries in Europe would be safe from contamination? Where would it be safe to visit?
(Don) I think she’s said that basically the whole world is contaminated but it’s just to a lesser degree. I would imagine that there’s a gradual [reduction] of radioactivity away from the central bombing areas, but we’ll go back to Leuren.
(Leuren) In terms of less contaminated areas, I would think Europe would be OK. Turkey is in the region of potential contamination and, if you are going for short visits, you have a better chance of not becoming contaminated. Of course there is no safe level of radiation exposure, but the people living in these regions, chronically exposed 24 hours a day to air borne [and] water borne [radiation], and [to] food contaminated with radiation, will be the most affected. It’s just everywhere. It’s really, I think, the greatest tragedy that humanity has faced. So I feel terrible about people who went to Iraq as human shields, to media who were there-they’re all contaminated. And when I was in Japan last summer I met the human shield people from Japan-they’re sick with depleted uranium exposure and over time it just continues to act in the body. So people really need to think about where they are going and be aware of the potential risk. Now the other question the gentleman had about this need for openness and democracy in the decision-making process [concerning] the nuclear weapons program, nuclear power plants, and now the DU, because it’s all the same-it’s alpha, beta, or gamma exposure internally whether it’s coming out of nuclear weapons, nuclear power plants, or depleted uranium or the radioactive weapons. The problem is that the secrecy has allowed these programs to be developed when they do tremendous harm to human health and all species, as well as the impact on the environment. And right now the United States is gearing up for a nuclear war. We now have nuclear weapons spending at the highest level ever-even [than] during the Cold War. It’s higher now than during the Cold War and the United States has no enemies. This is causing other countries to also increase nuclear weapons development and what I was shocked to discover in my research is that Japan and Germany are now tied in second place. They have passed Russia in nuclear weapons development. And the deeper purpose for all of this is to play nuclear blackmail and to frighten other countries into developing their nuclear weapons and thinking they need them. For
instance, India is afraid of Pakistan. Pakistan is afraid of India. Japan is afraid of North Korea. North Korea is afraid of South Korea. So everyone is developing nuclear weapons and what’s really happening is the US is manipulating these countries rimming China to develop nuclear weapons programs and we are enticing them to be our nuclear partners with China as a common and the real enemy.
(Don) I have so many more questions to ask you. One of the ones I wanted to ask is, what about the groundwater? Is that going to be contaminated for all time and how far away [from the areas of conflict] would it be contaminated?
(Leuren) The groundwater is contaminated of course. Over time, as the leftover bullets and ammunition that did not burn degrade and weather with the heat, and [with] the cold and seasonal changes-rain, snow, and the wind-[depleted uranium contamination] migrates into the groundwater. So there’s just a constant new supply of depleted uranium oxides and metal which will be released into the air and migrate through the ground into the groundwater. A study that the United Nations Environmental Program released last March 2003 reported that 25% of the bare metal, uranium bullets and weapons in the soil in Yugoslavia, had dissolved since 1998. So if 25% of the munitions buried in the ground dissolved in four or five years in a wet climate, it will be slower in desert areas, but it’s going to continue contaminating groundwater, soil, food and air.
(Don) And I think-you have mentioned that these particles go down into very fine sizes, so [I would imagine] there’s no way they can be filtered out of the water.
(Leuren) There’s no way to filter it out. It goes through all gas masks. It goes through all filters. These particles are a tenth of a micron or smaller. A red blood cell is seven microns and a white blood cell is about ten microns, so they are much, much smaller than even blood cells.
(Don) Before we wrap it up, I would like you to give us contacts on the website where people can find more information.
(Leuren) People can go to an excellent website:
www.mindfully.org and just do a Google search on my name, Moret.
They can also go to: www.traprockpeace.org That’s the Traprock Peace Centre in Connecticut. They have an excellent website. Lots of people get a lot of good information from it and they have a lot of information on depleted uranium. Those are probably the two best websites that I know of. There’s a letter to Congressman McDermott that I wrote. They could do a Google search on “letter to McDermott”. He’s a Congressman from Seattle, Washington who has introduced a bill in Congress, and I wrote him a letter with a lot of details. The attachments and the references are also on the website with a letter. That’s on the mindfully.org website, and then [there’s] my testimony for the International Criminal Tribunal for Afghanistan of December 13, 2003, which is also on the mindfully.org website. That testimony] has fourteen questions that the prosecutor sent me to answer, and there are questions like: What does the U.S. government know about DU? (My answer was twelve pages long). What is the connection between depleted uranium and fourth generation nuclear weapons? And then, what are the environmental and human effects?
(Don) What I think has to happen is [that] some organizations in Vancouver have to get together and bring you into Vancouver for a large meeting.
(Don asks remaining callers to give comments only)
(Caller #4) Well I was wondering about the possibility of certain plants being used to decontaminate the human body and [the] possible development of bacteria that might be used for that purpose also?
(Don) I was asking for comments. We don’t have time for questions now.
(Caller #4) Well my comment is that it is one big inhumane, parasitic, military-industrial, ecocidal and social atrocity.
(Don) Thank you.
Last comment of Leuren Moret:
(Leuren) I would like to read a quote from Henry Kissinger. “Military men are just dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy”. This is what the elite believe about our military. I am now working with an international group of scientists and radiation experts. We are forming a World Committee on Radiation Risks comprised of honest researchers to help citizens, elected officials, affected populations and individuals to learn the truth about radiation, and to work toward an international moratorium on depleted uranium and other radioactive weapons. So watch for us. The European Committee on Radiation Risk, within the European Parliament, has just published an excellent report on low-level radiation and you can get it at: www.euradcom.org And now the citizens of the world, the scientists of the world, the radiation experts of the world—we have to all work together and it’s not hopeless. But people need good information.
posted by:
|
|
Unsubscribed |
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 12:02 PMHurrahh!!!!!
Once again Willow rocks my world and gives me reason to celebrate!
Her, not her sad but true information.
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 6:39 PMSee here's your problem. The news is from Canada. I'm not doubting that depleted uranium is not good for biological life, but I sincerely doubt the effects are that severe. -
-
MAIN POINT N KASE
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 6:55 PM"See here's (thee) problem......depleted uranium is not good for biological life,"
there......
now thee state mint makes moor scents -
-
-
Re: write
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:00 PM>??? Learn to write...
eye did.....
then eye learned 2 "Re: write"......
-
-
Re: MAIN POINT N KASE
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 7:38 PMAnd yes the Muslims had spices. -
-
Getting to the Point
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:16 PMTo be honest, I didn't read past the first few lines because this is old news to me.
While scrolling down towards the replies, I kept an eye out for *solutions* to the problem,
but didn't catch anything.
In case solutions are buried in all those lines, would you be so kind as to list those here?
If no solutions were presented in the body of that post, then I'm interested in seeing what
suggestions anyone here may have regarding how to deal with this issue.
Me, I'm not big on lamenting problems I can't do anything about.
If I can't take action to change something, I move on to something I *can* make a difference on.
Thanks for posting the issue all the same. It's important for people to know what atrocities are
being committed. My 2 cents is that it's even *more* important to know what we can do about it :o) -
-
Unsu...
Re: Getting to the Point
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:34 PMMarley, you are truly the biggest spazz.
Well, see, the first step in solving a problem is getting the population to understand that there IS a problem. As long as we're in denial of that, there is not much that can be done, and things just go on as they have gone on.
The U.S. and Canada have both denied that depleted uranium is a problem for human health. Because of these denials, they refuse to stop using DU bombs/ammunition. See, until we stop doing what we're doing...there really is no solution.
Educating people about what is really going on in their name is the first step in creating enough momentum to get this really out in the open so that the powers that be stop doing what they're doing.
There are solutions...as was stated in the interview (if you had bothered to continue reading). But until we stop shelling/bombing with depleted uranium, there is not too much that that radiation experts can do about it. As long as reports keep coming out saying everything is fine, nothing changes.
Incomplete research going into the "Official Line" on DU:
BBC - news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middl...6105726.stm
So see? The first step is understanding...everything is not fine. This is not OK. Crack the Neptunian bubble. -
-
Re: Getting to the Point
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:46 PM"Marley, you are truly the biggest spazz."
Why do you need to be like that Willow?
Here I am actually supporting your effort, and you're insulting me.
Why do you continue to harass your ally?
What have I done to deserve your attacks?
So far it seems the only thing you're concerned about is all that's wrong with the world.
It seems you're only interested in complaining.
You don't seem interested in cutting to the chase and focusing on the solutions.
...and you call *me* a spazz.
Victims complain.
Non-Victims act.
What have you done Willow besides just bitch and complain?
What *actions* have you taken to make a difference in the world?
I challenge you to try taking action rather than just vomiting your discontent and preaching to the choir. -
-
oh marley
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:02 PMwillow nose what she's dewin.......
U seam sew kwik 2 throw this whole "viktim komplex" @ people who eye feel R merely trying 2 point sum thingz out, and they get mis N terpreted and much ov it eye dont doubt may bee N tentional sew az 2 avoid true diskushuns........
marley rites:
>So far it seems the only thing you're concerned about is all that's wrong with the world.
>It seems you're only interested in complaining.
however, az willow states:
>"Well, see, the first step in solving a problem is getting the population to understand that there IS a problem. As long as we're in denial of >that, there is not much that can be done, and things just go on as they have gone on. "
marley states:
>Me, I'm not big on lamenting problems I can't do anything about.
who sez we az a people kant fix that witch kneads fixing? this iz B yond thee skope ov just thee individual
>If I can't take action to change something, I move on to something I *can* make a difference on.
hue manity iz passed thee point that it gets 2 pick and choose what it werx on, az there R SIRIUSly MAJOR issues that knead kollektively addressing.......
-
-
Unsu...
Re: oh marley
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:19 PM"Here I am actually supporting your effort, and you're insulting me."
You're not actually supporting my effort...you're attempting to invalidate it. Again, by pulling out the victim complex thing and trying to paint me as a person who complains rather than takes action. This is false. Your attempts to invalidate me are really starting to irritate me, not to mention steal energy from what is really important...uncovering and understanding the facts about the circumstances we find ourselves in on this planet. No action can be effective until we truly see and understand what it is we're dealing with...again...which is why I am bringing this information up. What I can do about this is to bring it to the attention of the members of the collective who do not truly understand what is being done in Iraq and Afghanistan...to show people just what the U.S. and Canadian governments are doing right now as we type. How this is being whitewashed...how the entire Gulf War Syndrome is being denied by the powers that be. When enough people see through the propaganda, then we can start to make progress as a whole. The way forward goes one step at a time...creating a collective that is effective in its action means eduating those who want to change things...then the steps become known, I think.
The main point I am making with this information is that the collective reality DOES matter. The individual cannot exist in a bubble of its own making. If you are living on Planet Earth, these are pertinent issues...whether one wants to admit it or not. This is how war affects all of us. We can't pretend this is going on "over there" and that we need not be worried about it in North America. The planet's issues are all our issues. This is the point. -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
HEAR! HEAR!
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:02 PM"You're not actually supporting my effort...you're attempting to invalidate it. Again, by pulling out the victim complex thing and trying to paint me as a person who complains rather than takes action."
"This is false."
"...uncovering and understanding the facts about the circumstances we find ourselves in on this planet. No action can be effective until we truly see and understand what it is we're dealing with...again...which is why I am bringing this information up. What I can do about this is to bring it to the attention of the members of the collective who do not truly understand what is being done"
BING GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
and, well, U know.....
sted E and all that
-
-
-
Re: Getting to the Point
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:52 PMmarley, this post i'm referencing of yours at 8:46 does sum up what i perceived your attitude to be in your first response... before i read this one. that was my empathic take on where your attitude appeared to be at the time.
sometimes what we write bares little resemblence to the true nature of one's attitude in writing what they have to say.
personally i feel that to be the case as a non-biased bystander. i don't know what the history of most of you here and have no ax to grind.
just my own thoughts. -
-
Re: Getting to the Point
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:01 AM"sometimes what we write bares little resemblence to the true nature of one's attitude in writing what they have to say. "
with that comes the fact that your first response immediately created a wall & argumentative state.
either knowingly or unknowlingly.
subseqently acting like you did nothing to warrant the response you got
only makes things worse.
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Getting to the Point
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:04 AMlike i said, i don't know any of the parties involved except bedo.
it's just my take on things.
maybe this will help
maybe not.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:13 PMHmm...doubt the effects are that severe?
Well, one person who would beg to differ on that front would be Captain Terry Riordan of Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. Well, he would beg to differ if he weren't dead from the effects of depleted uranium poisoning.
Captain Riordan served in the Gulf War and came home to Canada in 1991. Unfortunately, he was ill from that point on from the effects of the radioactivity he had been exposed to. Really fun stuff like headaches, body pain, oozing rashes, exhaustion, violent mood swings and...oh yeah...burning semen that would cause blistering.
His condition progressed to the point where he had no fine motor co-ordination. By 1998 - 1999, he lost most cognitive function entirely and was lucid only a few hours per week.
Shortly before Captain Riordan died, he was tested for DU (depleted uranium) by Dr. Asaf Durakovic, a retired colonel in the U.S. Army Medical Corps and former professor of Nuclear Medicine at Georgetown University. It was found that he had 100 times the yearly maximum "safe" level of DU in his body. High concentrations were found in his bones and lungs. He died three days after finding out the results of his tests.
The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs estimates that 535,000 soldiers who served in the first Gulf War are on medical disability. Of those, at least 11,000 have died since 1991. And still there is denial that "Gulf War Syndrome" even exists.
Sorry, but this has been reported around the world. (Not that news from Canada is invalid...but just to appease your silly claim...)
Scotland's The Sunday Herald - findarticles.com/p/article..._n13939150
BBC - news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middl...6105726.stm
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:23 PMDoubt the effects are that severe?
Here you go:
“The Doctor, the Depleted Uranium and the Dying Children”
dprogram.wordpress.com/2008/0...ildren/
Here are some photos of the babies born deformed and with severe defects in Basra (from Dr. Jenan Hassan):
www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003...by2003.htm
And an article about it:
www.wrmea.com/archives/No...0511029.html
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:28 PMWell remember how John Wayne died. Shooting a movie downwind of nuclear testing. It killed most of the cast and crew within ten years. It's just that depleted uranium isn't as dangerous as radiation from an actual explosion. The risk is being overexaggerated. And even if it were true, who would really care? The Middle East doesn't have anything but a little bit of oil, opium, and dates. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:43 PMWell, Victor...that isn't true. See, the depleted uranium ammunition and bombs break down into fine particles of dust after hitting their targets, which are then inhaled by humans and animals. The particles then enter the blood stream and cause things like cancer, kidney failure, etc. The body can't get rid of it. It also causes severe birth defects in children.
Not sure why I'm even bothering to argue with your ever-so-intelligent discourse...but your info is wrong. You're arguing the same thing that the U.S. and UN are arguing...you're talking about the dust on the ground. Start talking about the dust in people's lungs/blood streams. Then you're getting closer to reality.
Why should you care? Well, all the soldiers who served in the first Gulf War as well as the current wars in Iraq and Aghanistan have been contaminated...so this is being carried back to the U.S. (If you don't care about the fact that soldiers are getting sick and dying from it...which, considering previous comments, you probably don't.)
As the stats say, of 251 Gulf War vets studies, 67% had children with severe birth defects after returning from the war.
And you know that crazy phenomenon called wind? Yeah. Turns out it carries dust much, much farther than just the country being bombed/shelled. It circulates. -
-
GO WILLOW!!!!!!!!
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 8:52 PMtell'em like it iz mate......
siriusly
wheel get thru all this sumhow.....
siriusly
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:09 PMI agree with Marley. Complaining doesn't do anything. And the past can't be fixed. That's why I'm bringing the Singularity in a couple decades. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:24 PMUmmm....this isn't the past. This is going on RIGHT NOW. As we type. Yet more depleted uranium being unleashed in Iraq and Afghanistan.
And yes, the past actually can be fixed. There are things that can be done to decrese the ill effects of depleted uranium...but not until we figure out that, yes, this is a problem. And yes, we do want to ban these types of weapons/ammunition and start the clean-up.
Your logic is very bizarre to me. "Complaining doesn't do anything." Well, who's complaining? It's called bringing information to light. Another head-in-sand burier, I guess. But then in the same sentence, you claim, "And the past can't be fixed." You really think that kind of idea does anything productive? -
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:46 PMListen to me. Calm down. I can see how agitated you are. Breathe.
Ok, now then. You were talking about the Gulf War and Gulf War Syndrome. That is why I said that we can't change the past. Denying that statement is logically impossible. I agree with you that dumping nuclear material is not good for biological life. I'm merely debating the extent of the effect. In either case, it isn't good. But remember that it is the Middle East. They will basically have nothing once humans start using alternative energy, meaning nuclear. Nuclear has amazing potential so I promote it for peaceful purposes. And this planet is in relatively good condition. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:56 PMAgain...my emotional state has nothing to do with the information put forth. I'm calm as a cucumber. But you and Marley both seem to like telling people to calm down. The old condescending "hysterical female" head pat.
You didn't say we can't change the past. You said, "And the past can't be fixed." There is a big difference between those two statements.
Again...this is not the past. People are living with Gulf War Syndrome today...as we type...and more people are being contaminated as we deny it's going on. While the current governments deny any problems at all. And here you are also saying, there's nothing that can be done. Horseshit cop-out.
I would have to highly disagree with nuclear energy being safe, as well. Chernobyl ring a bell? Also, where would you have us dispose of radioactive nuclear waste?
Oh, right! The same way the U.S. nuclear industry did. By pumping it into bombs and munitions to use in Iraq and Afghanistan. That worked out really well, didn't it? -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
a main point N kase hear:
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:59 PM"Again...my emotional state has nothing to do with the information put forth. I'm calm as a cucumber. But you and Marley both seem to like telling people to calm down. The old condescending "hysterical female" head pat."
yyyyyyep
"Again...this is not the past. People are living with Gulf War Syndrome today...as we type...and more people are being contaminated as we deny it's going on. While the current governments deny any problems at all. And here you are also saying, there's nothing that can be done. Horseshit cop-out. "
BING GOI
and sted E az we grow
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:14 PMHow you are responding has to do with your mental state though. And if you are getting all worked up, you cannot see the whole picture.
I'm not bringing your sex into the picture, though I must say that females aren't as logical ON AVERAGE. I put that in caps so you wouldn't cry.
By "And the past can't be fixed" I meant that the actions performed cannot be reversed. As the actions are the basis of the problem, I am saying that "complaining" does nothing. I'm not saying that you're complaining, but think about the problem logically.
And radiation poisoning is basically irreversable. If you are claiming that radiation poisoning is the primary cause of Gulf War Syndrome, that is.
Chernobyl was a government project. Three Mile Island never turned into a castastrophe because it was run by a corporation. That's the difference right there.
In a sealed mine. And we're close to nuclear fission at which point there will be no waste product.
And there's no need to worry about long term effects of nuclear waste because humans will be so technologically advanced in short order that disposing of it will be easy. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_...ty_Is_Near
And don't get sarcastic with me. Show some respect. Or at least proper etiquette. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:53 PM"I'm not bringing your sex into the picture, though I must say that females aren't as logical ON AVERAGE. I put that in caps so you wouldn't cry."
There is so much wrong with this sentence, I don't know where to start. I'm supposed to respect this sort of drivel? Sorry, me thinks not. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:54 PMHAHAHAHA
Yes, corporations have a great environmental track record, don't they?
Wow. That one almost slipped by me there. -
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:01 PMWhat's wrong with the statement? I said on average. There are always exceptions. But on average, women aren't quite as good at logic and spatial understanding.
And the largest polluter in the US is the US government.
-
-
-
-
-
again, a main point N kase
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 9:57 PM"I agree with you that dumping nuclear material is not good for biological life. I'm merely debating the extent of the effect. In either case, it isn't good."
AGAIN:
"I agree with you that dumping nuclear material is not good for biological life. it isn't good."
now, there we go.....
bottom line.....NO D B8 kneaded, just acknowledge mint leading 2 true diskushun leading 2 aktual resolushuns
sew, on with thee show
and sted E az we grow -
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.Unsu...
Re: again, a main point N kase
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:03 PMBut that isn't true agreement, bedouin. He doubts that the effects of the radioactivity are that severe. So in other words, he is stating that it's really not that big of a deal.
I'm saying...oh, it's a big deal, all right.
Something not being good for biological life could be...well...the Diet Coke I'm currently drinking. I'm sure that's not good for biological life.
This goes way beyond just not being good for biological life.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: again, a main point N kase
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:05 PMLike...the thing is...this causes genetic mutations/damage in the soldiers...which are then passed on to their children...which will then be passed on to their children...
You see how this is a bigger deal that Diet Coke, yeah? -
-
yep
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:17 PM>Like...the thing is...this causes genetic mutations/damage in the soldiers...which are then passed on to their children...which will then be >passed on to their children...
>You see how this is a bigger deal that Diet Coke, yeah?
seamz pretty ob V us 2 men E......
and iz N deed a rather "big deal"
alot ov it iz people may feel 0verwhelmed (az opposed 2 underwhelmed) and dont quite understand (rather than overstand) what one person kan actually dew.........and yes, iz knot a really kwik nor simple mthod 4 resolushun
however thee kwiker people kome 2 termz with all that kneadz addressing, Re: zolving, etc., thee kwiker wheel bee able 2 0verkome thee 0ddz..... -
-
Unsu...
Re: yep
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:40 PMYes, it is overwhelming. But denial of abominations can't go on...or the abominations go on. This is why I am arguing. Not to force the information on people...to stop the justifying, the explaining away, the personal discrediting, the subtle condescension, the logical fallacies.
One person can't stop it alone...but there are already many people working to bring this to light...scientists, doctors, journalists, activists, etc. I think we assist first by carrying awareness. Then how to help specifically becomes clear...once we have taken the responsibility of bearing witness.
I'm not trying to force this down people's throats. It's devastating information and takes a while to integrate...if it is integrated at all. But we have to, at the very least, admit it is going on. The abominations against humanity have to stop.
I have no problem with people saying they cannot bear it. What I have a problem with is people trying to invalidate or explain away. Trying to discredit the person passing on the information. That is the oldest trick in the book and doesn't get us anywhere. I don't think, after you have seen the evidence, there is any way to deny this. But still people try. So still I will attempt to break through the denial... -
-
Unsu...
Re: yep
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:49 PMThe more fully and deeply we understand the context of the circumstances on Planet Earth, the more effective our actions are, I think.
It's personal choice, I guess, how much context we can manage to take on.
This information is depressing and horrifying. No argument there. BUT! There are things that can be done. There is clean-up that can limit the damage. We can stop it from continuing, from spreading. We can validate the experience of the people who are sick/dying/dead from DU...instead of denying there is anything going on. I think that's what truly victimizes people...the denial of what they are going through and what happened and the continuation of what hurt them in the first place. If we admit that an absolute tragedy has occurred with this depleted uranium, we can take action to stop this from continuing and affecting even more generations.
But as I said, first we have to stop using this shit! We have to admit that it is an absolute crime against humanity and just stop. And I guess, again, it goes back to whether we can stop the powers that be when they are so far gone...I don't know that answer. All I know is that I'm here to try my best. There is no other way to live once you have become aware. -
-
Re: M phasizing
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:05 PM
>This information is depressing and horrifying. No argument there. BUT! There are things that can be done. There is clean-up that can limit the >damage. We can stop it from continuing, from spreading. We can validate the experience of the people who are sick/dying/dead from >DU...instead of denying there is anything going on. I think that's what truly victimizes people...the denial of what they are going through and >what happened and the continuation of what hurt them in the first place. If we admit that an absolute tragedy has occurred with this depleted >uranium, we can take action to stop this from continuing and affecting even more generations.
>But as I said, first we have to stop using this shit! We have to admit that it is an absolute crime against humanity and just stop. And I guess, >again, it goes back to whether we can stop the powers that be when they are so far gone...I don't know that answer. All I know is that I'm here >to try my best. There is no other way to live once you have become aware.
again, hour sentiments exaktly......again
-
-
Re: pete:
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:02 PM>Not to force the information on people...to stop the justifying, the explaining away, the personal discrediting, the subtle condescension, the >logical fallacies.
>One person can't stop it alone...but there are already many people working to bring this to light...scientists, doctors, journalists, activists, etc. >I think we assist first by carrying awareness. Then how to help specifically becomes clear...once we have taken the responsibility of bearing >witness.
>I'm not trying to force this down people's throats. It's devastating information and takes a while to integrate...if it is integrated at all. But we >have to, at the very least, admit it is going on. The abominations against humanity have to stop.
>I have no problem with people saying they cannot bear it. What I have a problem with is people trying to invalidate or explain away. Trying >to discredit the person passing on the information. That is the oldest trick in the book and doesn't get us anywhere. I don't think, after you >have seen the evidence, there is any way to deny this. But still people try. So still I will attempt to break through the denial...
hour sentiments exaktly mate
BIG TIME
karry on kapt
karry on
-
-
-
-
Re: again, a main point N kase
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:11 PMBut that isn't true agreement, bedouin. He doubts that the effects of the radioactivity are that severe. So in other words, he is stating that it's really not that big of a deal.
-
Re: again, a main point N kase
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 10:12 PM"But that isn't true agreement, bedouin. He doubts that the effects of the radioactivity are that severe. So in other words, he is stating that it's really not that big of a deal. "
yes, eye know......
eye was just arranging thee state mint sew that it mite help 2 sea it az if were a true agree mint, thats all.....
otherwise, U R N deed, az usual kapt, korrekt
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:26 PM"The Middle East doesn't have anything but a little bit of oil, opium, and dates."
Ouch!
I thought people lived there too.
People born into the region of land most strategically located for the pipelines and roadways that take the oil to the ships which bring it to the USA. and Europe. -
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:36 PMYeah people live there but they have to import much of their resources. My point is that it's not resource rich land. I'd be much more concerned if the depleted uranium was in a more important area such as the US or Siberia. Or almost anywhere in Western Europe. -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:44 PM<snort!>
The point (that you've clearly missed) is that there is radioactive dust throughout Iraq, Afghanistan and Yugoslavia...which is killing people. Causing great suffering, disease, death.
But you'd be more concerned if it were in a more "important" area.
My...dear...God.
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Sun, July 27, 2008 - 11:50 PMYes I'm looking at this logically and scientifically.
Oh and by the way souls exist but God does not. I know this to be true.
More important areas are areas that have a full range of resources necessary for human development in the unlikely possibility that there is an apocalyptic event. Humans living in a high importance area could redevelop technology. The Middle East is not such a place. In the event of a civilization destroying event, no one with any understanding of the world would want to live in the Middle East. -
-
LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:01 AMhey willow, never mined viktor.......we sea thee main faktor hear........harmful radiation on a planet duznt matter where yore "safe zonez" may bee, az ray D A shun duznt just stay "0ver there"....windz dew blow....saw last knight a radar pik ov kali4nia smoke from fires B ing blown all thee weigh 2 thee arktik, and having certain affex there from such amt ov smoke.......smoke from huge 4rest fires blow wing all thee weigh up north 2 thee arktik........mined boggling all most........
sew yeah, know matter where thee issue iz, if hue manz R dying and thee planet iz B koming toxik, thee issue kneadz direly addressing......
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:05 AMYou kids must also be the people who think that global warming is a grave threat to the planet. I mean, really. -
-
Unsu...
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:08 AMYou're a perfect example of why Aquarius will fail without learning the lessons of Pisces first. Thanks for the illustration. -
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:18 AMI'm not into astrological signs, but I'm told that I'm a Pisces. Birthday February 22nd, but I'm not sure what year.
-
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:38 AM"You kids must also be the people who think that global warming is a grave threat to the planet. I mean, really."
know, eye'm one ov those who thinx thee "global warming" scenario was maid N2 a "threatening scenario", a "politikal" scenario, and a massive D strakshun from that witch truly kneadz sum paying attenshun 2, kuz everytime we bring up affex hue manity iz having on thee planet we hear from sum "dont gimme this global warming krap"........
well, we gonna keep on keepin on with dissiminating certain data, "like it oar knot", Re: gaurdless ov thee neg8ors......
siriusly....... -
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:53 AMWell in the Jurassic Period around 180 mya, there was a period in which the temperature went up 9 degrees Farenheight in a very short period of time. Now, the most pessimistic view is that the Earth will warm by 4 degrees Farenheight by the end of the century. But again, we'll hit the Technological Singularity before then. And even if we didn't, the world isn't going to end. The Earth temperature has fluctuated drastically at several points in history. No big deal. -
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 1:02 AM"Well in the Jurassic Period around 180 mya, there was a period in which"
were U "there"? oh, yeah, its just ben "proven".....buy those who have N vested interests know doubt.......
N E weigh, eye'm knot gonna sit hear and argue semen-antix......
kuz its ob V us yer gonna "D-B8 whatever we say, sew eye am knot gonna waste thee NRG......
pulling back
sted E at M pulse
and on with thee show -
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 1:11 AMThe data's available if you want to peruse it.
It's impossible to have an intelligent conversation if one side presents their idea using nonmainstream scientific beliefs and the other side presents mainstream proven facts and the wacked out side says, oh no that doesn't count. How is that productive? Oh wait, you don't care about the truth. You just don't want to look foolish. How egotistical. -
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 3:28 AMwhy do people continue to feed trolls?
This was/is a valuable report. As always, it has been sidetracked into personal attacks. When a troll is this obvious, just pat them on the
head and then ignore them. You don't have to respond. Like very other Vampire, Ghosty or Boogie monster, they only have the power you give them. -
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 3:48 AMI was simply being the objective voice instead of a subjective emotionally attached yesman.
And if it's such a huge issue, why aren't larger scientific institutes worried about it?
And I'm not a troll; I'm a killer. -
-
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 7:10 AMThank you Victor for giving us an example of why we must all continue our actions and wake up calls.
Yes, this has happened to the earth before. Yes, the earth survived. Most of the things on it did not. What we have on earth now has come to be after the changes. If people were here then, and ancient Elders of tribes around the world say they, we, were here, only a handful survived the changes. The Elders are telling us this will happen again.
Also, this is the first time these changes have happened so fast the earth has not had time to respond to the changes. The willow trees of northern Europe were able to move south each year during the last coming ice age. Just one example. The earth knew what was going on, and had time to respond. So did people. This time, it is accelerated due to human caused effects of global warming, not just natural causes. Nothing has the natural 'geologic' time necessary to respond in a way that will allow them to survive.
So you see, Victor, you are in a way correct, but your time frame is flawed and will cause your failure to survive. -
-
BING GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 1:12 PM>This time, it is accelerated due to human caused effects of global warming, not just natural causes. Nothing has the natural 'geologic' time >necessary to respond in a way that will allow them to survive."
she sed XLR8 ;;>)))
>So you see, Victor, you are in a way correct, but your time frame is flawed and will cause your failure to survive.
N deed this bee thee kase -
-
-
-
Re: BING GO!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 1:28 PMlol, I know that sesspool!
-
-
-
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 11:24 AMAnd I'm not a troll; I'm a killer.
__________
yes indeed..
a thread killer
-
-
Re: LOL
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 8:59 AMVictor ~
"intelligent conversation"?
That's not why you joined this tribe.
I know you better than that.
love all-ways,
mem
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 11:29 AM<<< I'm not doubting that depleted uranium is not good for
biological life, but I sincerely doubt the effects are that severe. >>>
You should see the photograph of an uranium-damaged baby I saw last week.
I won't even describe it. Because it was / is too awful.
-
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 11:37 AMYes, indeed. Here is an entire page of photos taken by Dr. Jenan Hassan in a hospital in Basra...
Click at your own risk. It's horrific. But if you are in denial about what DU does...here's a slap upside the head:
www.mindfully.org/Nucs/2003...by2003.htm -
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:06 PMI wouldn't bother wasting time writing more text to anyone who just wants to bait others, and would just keep posting that link, along with the others...and maybe a little intro like "Check the evidence for yourself..... (links)"
"Where there is no wood, the fire goes out" -
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 12:32 PMThat's what I'm doing...why do you think I posted here? :)
I'm choosing to respond in a limited way...not wasting my energy. His ideas are shared by other people...so it's not just pure baiting. There are underlying dynamics that I'm addressing because I think it's important...to a certain extent only, of course. -
-
sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 1:13 PM>I'm choosing to respond in a limited way...not wasting my energy. His ideas are shared by other people...so it's not just pure baiting. There are >underlying dynamics that I'm addressing because I think it's important...to a certain extent only, of course.
dewin a mighty fine job U R kapt......
SIRIUSLY -
-
Unsu...
Re: sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 1:19 PMThank-you, sir.
Although, Aloka, I do understand that there is a fine line here. So thanks for pointing it out. It's easy to fall into those draining dynamics that go nowhere...but since I've fallen into that particular cesspool so many times in the past, I know how to walk the edge. :) -
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 2:21 PM>I know how to walk the edge. :)
walk that edge kapt.....
we're rite B side ya
and sted E az we grow
-
-
This is the maximum depth. Additional responses will not be threaded.
Re: sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 6:10 PMYou kids are missing the main point that I made, that a huge paradigm shift is going to happen in 30 years or so with the Singularity. So even if the Earth was going to explode in 50 years and there was nothing we could do about it, that wouldn't even be a problem. -
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 7:39 PM -
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 9:36 PMNo no. The Mayan Calender ends December 21st, 2012. Not the beginning of the year 2012. And nothing is going to happen anyway.
-
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Mon, July 28, 2008 - 11:27 PMMissing the point, and it won't matter anyway?
Whoowhoooo if that is the case.
I have children and Grandchildren.
I am covering all the bases.
-
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Tue, July 29, 2008 - 12:45 AMJust look up The Singularity is Near on Wikipedia. -
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Tue, July 29, 2008 - 3:52 AMSkimmed it.
Here's a thought about stuff like quantum tubule processing ....maybe it's all been achieved allready, a vary long time ago... -
-
Re: sted E az we grow
Tue, July 29, 2008 - 4:06 AMI doubt it, unless you're talking about a nonhuman species. But yeah, I don't worry about long term problems for that reason.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, July 29, 2008 - 8:28 AM
Larry
LOL
The video on your profile of Darth Vadar and Luke is waaaaaaay hella funny!
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, August 19, 2008 - 5:33 AMThe allies fleet is on its way. Sumbarine wars is 2012 or before with Uranus in Cetus, the Mayan end. The stage will be broken along with puppets, Russians, aliens, Georgians, ... Actually the Magog, Scynthians and Cimmerians. Gog is Putin. many omens, eclipse path crosses Chiron approach, 888 in itself an omen, NASA launches projectile at Moon, 2009 Islamic end of world. I am presently reading 2009 report with Uranus in Cetus and many other interesting omens. No Konan, no mayas but convincing and scientific portents, not very favorable. 2009 could end us for good, of course it will not, but... -
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, August 19, 2008 - 5:35 AMGog is Putin
________
what leads you to say this rondi?
-
Unsu...
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, August 19, 2008 - 5:58 AMRondinella.... please.... bee quite... let the class learn on their own... -
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, August 19, 2008 - 6:31 AMCorona Mass Ejection 2009 tiea in with Islamic world-end date (would knock out all electricity grids)...
He told there would be three events occurring in the near future: a Corona Mass Ejection, a magnetic pole reversal, and finally a pole shift. He answered our questions to a point and then apologized that he could not say more as he was bound by his National Security Oath. He said these events are set to start around 2009 and culminate in 2012.
www.care2.com/c2c/share/detail/525044
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, August 19, 2008 - 2:59 PMDoom is ALWAYS on the horizon isn't it?
Please, can you provide the second (backup date) once your projections come and pass without incident. I mean, why should anyone here get comfortable in their skin when they can look forward to death, cataclysm, war, pollution and the general collapse of things as they are.
Just keep pushing that date forward.
-
-
-
Re: Nuclear War is Already Being Waged
Tue, August 19, 2008 - 3:06 PM12th dec 2121 ;-)
-
-
